Public liability and personal injury exposures continue to evolve, with shifting behaviours, new environments and reshaping community expectations how incidents occur and how responsibility is assessed.
In that landscape, staying across trends in case outcomes is essential to understanding where risks are emerging and how courts are responding. Our Casualty Hub brings together insights that help you track these developments, anticipate change and support confident, well-informed decision-making across your portfolio.
6 articles available. Showing 1 - 6.
29 April 2026 |
The jury did what!? Case note on Sakibul Haque v Alan Mance Motors Pty Ltd
One may have thought that a plaintiff who tripped on a mat, which he himself had placed on the ground moments before, would warrant a high reduction for contributory negligence. Not with this jury!
One may have thought that a plaintiff who tripped on a mat, which he himself had placed on the ground moments before, would warrant a high reduction for contributory negligence. Not with this jury!
28 April 2026 |
Plead carefully! Case note on St Paul's College Ltd v Allan
This decision demonstrates how the case of AA v The Trustees of the Roman Catholic Church for the Diocese of Maitland-Newcastle has reshaped pleadings in negligence cases involving non-delegable duties.
This decision demonstrates how the case of AA v The Trustees of the Roman Catholic Church for the Diocese of Maitland-Newcastle has reshaped pleadings in negligence cases involving non-delegable duties.
27 April 2026 |
Consequences of letting off the hand brake! Apportioning damages under competing legislative regimes
The decision in Anderson v Claytons Towing provides a useful insight into the calculation and apportionment of damages where two competing damages regimes are at play.
The decision in Anderson v Claytons Towing provides a useful insight into the calculation and apportionment of damages where two competing damages regimes are at play.
24 April 2026 |
Supreme Court's distinctive approach to assessing common law general damages in personal injury claims
This case involved the assessment of general damages for the benefit of the estate of the plaintiff who had succumbed to mesothelioma aged 88.
This case involved the assessment of general damages for the benefit of the estate of the plaintiff who had succumbed to mesothelioma aged 88.
23 April 2026 |
Digging into indemnity. Who is the employer in labour hire arrangements?
A worker injured whilst attempting to repair an excavator bucket prompted the Court to examine who was the true employer in a labour hire arrangement.
A worker injured whilst attempting to repair an excavator bucket prompted the Court to examine who was the true employer in a labour hire arrangement.
22 April 2026 |
High Court revisits the 'touchstone of reasonableness'
In 1977 a High Court decision established that a plaintiff's entitlement to damages for future medical care was to be guided by a 'touchstone of reasonableness'. Almost 50 years later the legal test was confirmed.
In 1977 a High Court decision established that a plaintiff's entitlement to damages for future medical care was to be guided by a 'touchstone of reasonableness'. Almost 50 years later the legal test was confirmed.
Search Sparkes' Casualty Hub articles
Contact
Janelle Barron
Special Counsel
t: +61 7 3016 5064+61 7 3016 5064
m: +61 401 922 978+61 401 922 978
o: Brisbane
Special Counsel
t: +61 7 3016 5064+61 7 3016 5064
m: +61 401 922 978+61 401 922 978
o: Brisbane
